Talk:John Rowlands (RAF officer)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Rowlands (RAF officer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Rowlands (RAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206181148/http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/milestones-of-flight/british_military/1952.cfm to http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/milestones-of-flight/british_military/1952.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
use of bold
edit@Abraham, B.S. reverted this edit because "knighthood is formally part of Rowland's name." I do not dispute that, however, the guidance at MOS:BOLD "is to highlight the first occurrence of the article's title word or phrase in the lead section." I removed boldface from "sir" because it is not part of "the article's title word or phrase." ~TPW 15:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I note that MOS:BOLD says: "The most common use of boldface is to highlight the first occurrence of the article's title word or phrase in the lead section." That is, it is most common for the article's title word to be bolded, not that it must be. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)