Talk:John S. Walmsley Jr./GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 03:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Operation Strangle link goes to the one in Italy in 1944.
- That article also makes reference to the 1950 Operation Strangle since both missions were essentially the same thing against different targets. —Ed!(talk) 19:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you linked in the lede, there's no need to link again in the main body, IMO.
- WP:LINK says links should appear once in the lede and once in the body of the text. —Ed!(talk) 19:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- DMY as US military article.
- Was the train shooting at the aircraft or were AA emplacements along the RR track?
- Clarified. —Ed!(talk) 19:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Operation Strangle link goes to the one in Italy in 1944.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Made all the fixes. Thanks for your review! —Ed!(talk) 19:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: