Talk:John Sackville, 3rd Duke of Dorset
 | A fact from John Sackville, 3rd Duke of Dorset appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 February 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Illegitimate child
editThe article states: "Since [Lady Derby's] husband refused to divorce her, her child with Dorset was born illegitimate."
This is impossible under the law at that time. A child born to a married woman was legitimate, legally the child of her husband. This was true even if the child was known to be fathered by another man. One way around it was to send the wife off to have her baby in secrecy (as the Duchess of Devonshire did with her child by Lord Grey). Is that what happened here? Or did Lord Derby publicly denounce his wife and the child? Laura1822 14:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on John Sackville, 3rd Duke of Dorset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121010153249/http://www.jl.sl.btinternet.co.uk/stampsite/cricket/ladstolords/1761.html#dorset to http://www.cricinfo.com/db/PLAYERS/ENG/D/DORSET_DUKE_01029488/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20011118235805/http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/explore/work06giova.html to http://web.ukonline.co.uk/nigel.battysmith/Database/D0008/I22619.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008181258/http://www.sevenoaks-life.co.uk/index.php/article/articlestatic/69/1/1/ to http://www.sevenoaks-life.co.uk/index.php/article/articlestatic/69/1/1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Cricket team to France
editThe story about the cricket touring team to France in July 1789 is a classic example of the need for reliable sources. I was reading the John Major book last night and was amused by his account of Dorset's departure from France. I checked the WP article this morning to see if it was mentioned and found that the team was recorded as unsourced fact. As Major says, it is nonsense. I've made appropriate changes in the light of Major's evidence but the whole of the cricket coverage in this article needs to be verified. In the ambassador section, I think the information is accurate although I have requested citations here too. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)