Talk:John Sheil

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

hangon

edit

Three points in defence of the article,

  1. the source is acknowledged;
  2. there's no extraneous text there, just the facts, and while text can be copyrighted, facts can't;
  3. the text comes from the "notes for editors" section of a press release, which by my understanding is tantamount to an abandonment of any copyright claim.
    Bazj (talk) 18:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  4. Acknowledgement makes no difference; it makes quotes alright, not prose.
  5. The way in which the facts are phrased can certainly be copyrighted.
  6. "notes to editors" is never an abandonment of copyright unless directly expressed. Wikipedia policy is to verge on the "delete" side of possibly copyrighted material so as to avoid icky lawsuits, and the site itself specifically says that "Material on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated". Ironholds (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Sheil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply