Talk:John Triscari

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Hawkeye7 in topic GA concerns
Good articleJohn Triscari has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starJohn Triscari is part of the Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed
January 7, 2014Featured topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 18, 2013.
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:John Triscari/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 01:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I will have a look at this tomorrow. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

On hold. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK, looks good. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on John Triscari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Triscari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

edit

After reviewing the article, I am concerned that this no longer meets the GA criteria. My concerns are listed below:

  • There is no information post-2013.
  • The lede is too short and does not summarise the contents of the article.

Is anyone interested in fixing this up? If not, should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have expanded the lead and updated it to 2024. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply