Talk:John W. Berry (psychologist)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... John Berry is one of the conteporary most influential researchers in the field of psychology. His articles have been cited up to 3000 times, which makes the impact of his work extraordinary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarathustra35 (talk • contribs)
- Firstly, Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.
Secondly, I tried to find the claims of ″strong impact″, but alas could find neither those citations nor the claim. With all due respect to the Academic in question here, the answer to the query whether or not his impact on the field is strong, cannot be based on your word of mouth (or misguided good faith). The very reason I am feeling iffy about an AFD at this stage is precisely his academic merit. But neither of us can let our predilections run amok here. We need proof of his impact. Secondary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and to avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. We need more than just our POVs.
Please see WP:Verifiability, WP:PRIMARY, WP:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability, WP:No original research. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 09:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey, sorry, I am new in wiki and still learning. I hope the article has improved now. --Zarathustra35 (talk) 09:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John W. Berry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121121005605/http://www.queensu.ca/psychology/People/Emeritus-Retired/JohnBerry.html to http://www.queensu.ca/psychology/People/Emeritus-Retired/JohnBerry.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)