Talk:John Wieting/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) at 14:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• Missing short description

• Added

• Wieting spent "He spent"

• sure

• After purchasing equipment specify what type of equipments

• Sure

• at the age of forty-five in 1862, better write 45 in number

• Sure

• Mary Elizabeth (Manchester) suggesting {{nee}}
• had immigrated to the US suggesting to spell United States
• He eventually replace 'he' with his surname
• over seventeen hundred body parts hyphenate, or write as one-thousand seven-hundred
• Wieting gave talks any better word than 'talk'?
• wrote that Wieting's lectures were aimed at shock[ing] and titillat[ing] audiences" the quote ends but never starts!

• Done all the above

• attempting to purchase it for $25,000 suggesting to use {{inflation}}

• Hard to do b/c no exact start year

• for 3/4 ownership use {{Frac}}
• and was buried in Oakwood Cemetery fix the disambiguation link
• His mausoleum whose?

• done the above

• Anything to say about his legacy?

• added some stuff about the opera house

• Image missing ALT text

• Added

• Footnotes all good!
• The following sources are mentioned, but never used as footnotes:
  • Keim, Norman O. (2008-06-09). Our Movie Houses: A History of Film and Cinematic Innovation in Central New York. Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-0896-7.
  • Hirsch, Foster (2000-09-05). The Boys from Syracuse: The Shuberts' Theatrical Empire. Cooper Square Press. ISBN 978-1-4616-9875-3.

• should be used now

• Inconsistency in writing publication location: New York, NY v. Boston, Mass..

• hopefully standardized-- cut all I found

• Very high copyvio from https://smiletimegh.com/who-is-john-wieting-biography-career-net-worth/, which is very likely a mirror of Wiki. So, no issues.

That is pretty much all there is to say!

Thanks, Kavyansh.Singh, what do you think now? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Wrapping up

We are pretty much near the end of this review, just take care of the following minor points:

• Add something, a line or two, from the legacy section to the lead
  • Sure
• Date format: 2018-06-05 in "References" v. July 28, 2005 in footnotes section. There are a few other instances as well
  • Should be good now
• How are you ordering "References"? Suggesting to keep it alphabetical.
  • Alphabetized

That is it! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks again, Kavyansh.Singh, What do you think now? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Congrats on your zillionth GA! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)