Talk:John William Lambert

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John William Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311150826/http://www.andersonlibrary.net/indianaroom/history/autohistory.shtml to http://www.andersonlibrary.net/indianaroom/history/autohistory.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:John William Lambert/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JPxG (talk · contribs) 06:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I'll do my best! jp×g

Preliminary notes

• This has some stuff about a James Swoveland affirming to have ridden in Lambert's car in 1891, that might warrant mention.

• @JPxG: Thanks for hint (nice catch). I have that article in my article already eleven times as Ref #4.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
• User:JPxG Any other issues I should work on? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

• Sorry, this one kind of fell off the radar. I will go through it in a bit. jp×g 04:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

• Y: Great, no action required.
•  : Not necessary but might be worth looking at.
• N: Needs to be fixed.

Copyvio

• Y Earwig's detector says everything is fine.

Stability

• Y Article is quite stable. Has not been the subject of any controversy except from an IP address repeatedly adding stuff like "where he learned how to fly" and "harold".

POV

•   Minor amounts of general fluff like "That was a good thing, since", not a big deal.

•  Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Media

• Y All images are public-domain, clearly illustrative, and cool.
•   What the heck is going on with the front left wheel in this image?

•  Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Focus / scope / coverage / completeness

• N There were about 300 horseless carriages built up to 1895,[4] but Lambert was the first with a functional working automobile that he created in 1891 Huh?

•  Done Copy edited accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

• N Lambert's father was the president, and he was the treasurer and general manager Lambert was the treasurer and general manager, or his father was?

•  Done Copy edited accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Prose / MoS / ref check

• Y Ref 1 looks good.
• Y Ref 2 looks good.
• Y Ref 3 looks good.
• Y Ref 4 looks good.
• Y Ref 5 looks good.
• Y Ref 6 looks good.
• Y Ref 7 isn't accessible for me but I will try to get a hold of it somewhere. It isn't very load-bearing, so I will AGF.
• Y Ref 8 looks good.
• Y Ref 9 looks good.
• Y Ref 10 looks good.
• Y Refs 11 - 18 look good.
• N Ref 19 is "newspaper clip "Oldest Resident of Ohio City" "Death Claims 1st Passenger of gasoline auto"". No year, no publication, no author, no link... :(

•  Done Removed, as other inline references in the paragraph cover the first accident.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

• Y Ref 20 looks good.
• Y Ref 21 looks good.
•   Ref 22 could do with a link.
• Y Ref 23 looks good.

Conclusion

• I have been a little consumed by tasks today, so might have to get around to finishing this tomorrow. jp×g 04:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

• User:JPxG All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

• @Doug Coldwell: Everything looks good. Passing.

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)