Talk:John Zogby

Untitled

it was infringing on http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2185/is_3_13/ai_84547013 --Eean 21:22, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

It says that he "correctly called the Quebec provincial election of 1998 for the Liberals". This is wrong. The PQ won that election. See Quebec general election, 1998. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

On this page, I belive he means he correctly called the POPULAR VOTE of the provincial election of 1998 for the Liberals. It's easier to project the national popular vote than the actual number of seats won in multi-party first past the post system. Jon 21:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Most of the content on this page really belongs in an article about "Zogby International". Seems odd that this page refers to the polling as a personal act of John Zogby, when it should be referring to the work of an organization. --75.68.148.143 12:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Zogby International

I find it hard to believe that this polling organization is not (big/important/noteworthy) enough to warrant its own page at Wikipedia. Why is it rolled into John Zogby's bio page as a footnote? --SVTCobra (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Pushpolling?

Should the bit on Zogby's push poll be in here in its current form? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Szfski (talk • contribs) 02:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Positive Spin

I don't normally edit wikipedia articles, but I was looking at this article after taking an in-depth class on polling and it seems to understate the criticisms of Zogby's polling efforts. Consider for example, this article. Especially given the concern that Zogby himself contributed to this article, I think this entry should be flagged for revision. Zogby is definitely an important American figure, but his reputation is much more mixed than this article would indicate.

Best of luck Wikipedia editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.6.66 (talk) 04:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

What about this article? [1] This page is waaaaay too generous for its not mentioning that Zogby's online polling should have zero credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.112.66.66 (talk) 05:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Separate the person from the companies

They're different things, and also having the page be about the person and the companies may inhibit posting of criticism.2001:984:6FB5:1:A16C:D636:3674:F222 (talk) 16:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Zogby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090923154241/http://www.timesunion.com:80/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=798674 to http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=798674&newsdate=5/11/2009

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)