Talk:Johnny Matson
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism of his citation practices
editThere has been some criticism of Matson's practice of copiously citing himself in his papers, and publishing in journals he is also the editor of: This mentions 21 self-citations in one page of one paper; this refers to 34 papers published in his own journals (in 2013); this breaks down the 64 citations in one of his papers -- 31 self-cites, 33 from own journals; this counts 90 papers by him since the 2007 founding of (one of) the journals he edits; this identifies 24 self-citations out of 36 in one paper, and & 33 out of 63 in another; this mentions a over 50% self-cited paper (in journal he edits); this categorizes 25 out of 50 citations as self-cites in yet another paper; this points out a paper quickly accepted (in less than 10 days) by his own journal, with 34 self-cites; this indirectly refers to a paper (in his own journal) with 25 self-cites; this categorizes 42 of 60 cites in a paper to his own journals; this counts 27 (of 44) self-cites in own journal paper; this counts 80 of his papers from one of his journals. I'm not sure how this should best be mentioned in the article, but I thought it worthwhile to bring it up on the talk page to try and get other views on the matter. JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- This points out that, as of today, Matson has already gotten 4 papers published in the 2014 issue of one of the journals he edits. This appears unseemly, at best. JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- This points out that, in the 10 papers Matson has published (in 2014 so far') in the journal he is editor-in-chief of, he's cited himself 274 times. JesseW, the juggling janitor 05:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Also see this post on Dorothy Bishop's blog. Matson has the highest self-citation rate of any autism researcher and he is "an author on over ten percent of the papers published in RASD since 2007", the journal he edits himself. Bishop is a highly respected researcher and her blog is widely read — this is definitely notable and should be in the article. Posessvils (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johnny Matson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:a6A6chRu3f4J:www.lsu.edu/psychology/documents/vita/JLM_Vita.doc+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20131214070219/http://www.lsu.edu/psychology/documents/vita/JLM_Vita.doc on https://www.lsu.edu/psychology/documents/vita/JLM_Vita.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)