Talk:Johnny McNichol/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Very well written, couldn't fault it.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All challengeable claims are verifiably referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers the subject as well as is possible.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias noted in the prose.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image of Johnny seems suitably licensed.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Pass The Rambling Man (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)