Talk:Johor Bahru Old Chinese Temple

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

The notability of the subject is currently unclear, since no sources are cited. By the notability criteria, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press articles or books, for example. The sources may, but need not, be available online; it is however important that they are explicitly cited.

I may well be possible that such sources exist for this temple, but none have been added for a quite long time, casting doubt on its notability.

For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 11:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have edited the entry, please review it. If deem suitable, please remove the notability tag. Thanks Reinhard tan 18:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Johor Bahru Old Chinese Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply