Talk:Jomfru Ane Gade
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Most known?
editWell, isn´t that a bit off a over-sell? Ströget is slightly more well-known, but sure, nice street! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.71.173.132 (talk) 03:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- I've put POV disputability sign. Kicior99 (talk) 20:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- This definitely needs a lot of work -- the whole thing reads embarrasssingly like a tourist advert. Peterravn (talk) 13:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- In generel this article seems to reflect the local impression in Aalborg and not in Denmark. I live in Aarhus a few hours drive som Aalborg and I am sometime amused how overrated this street is. Aalborg does, as Obama would say in some cases "Punch above its weight" and is the biggest city in the Northern part of the country. However in some cases it seems like the locals then believe the city has the same culture quantity as metropolitan areas. Locals often compares it to Paris and seem so have a confirmation bias about its size. Its pretty clear that other streets in larger cities in Denmark as Copenhagen and Aarhus has more well known streets and also streets with more bars and restaurants. Also if your are looking at the density only over several streets its pretty obvious that areas around Åboulevarden in Aarhus or Pisserenden in Copenhagen has way more nightclubs, bars, restaurants cafes etc. I also only found one case in a now deleted online paper from local police district that decribes it as the "Most dense street". I assume it is in the area and not in Denmark, the paper has also taken down.
- This definitely needs a lot of work -- the whole thing reads embarrasssingly like a tourist advert. Peterravn (talk) 13:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jomfru Ane Gade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080312021750/http://www.jomfru-ane.dk/index.php?id=4 to http://www.jomfru-ane.dk/index.php?id=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)