Talk:Jon Pollock

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Thine Antique Pen in topic GA Review
Good articleJon Pollock has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 14, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 26, 2012.

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jon Pollock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Added image. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Reviewer: W.D. (talk · contribs) 10:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC)Reply