Talk:Jonathan Bartley

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Greenhistory in topic Council position

David Cameron Incident

edit

I've changed back the rewrite of this section by new user 78.105.67.167. Way too (entirely) pro-Bartley.

Still reads like a Bartley press-release. It's supposed to be an encyclopaedic record, not an explanation from a Bartley supporter (or himself) about how he was totally right. The original is more than fair and gives Bartley's response. Sir Oki (talk) 09:14, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jonathan Bartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

The point made by User:Bondegezou in the edit summary for this [1] edit is valid, but WP:ELMINOFFICIAL suggests using only one. I have not found an official site for the subject alone, but maybe a Green Party link would be best rather than choosing one of the current links, as politics are his main claim to notability? What do others think?SovalValtos (talk) 11:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Facebook account linked to is a political one, not his personal one. His Twitter account is also largely political. So they seem relevant to me. Bondegezou (talk) 11:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Settling on facebook in absence of anything betterSovalValtos (talk) 07:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Council position

edit

Whether to list this or not is subject of a discussion on the UK politics project talk page. Please leave the position in place until consensus is reached. Greenhistory (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply