Talk:Jorge Medina/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 08:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Krisgabwoosh, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 08:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Initial comments

• There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 26.5% in similarity.
• There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period (besides the IAbot acting weird).
• No previous GA reviews.

The rest of the review will be focused on the six GA criteria.

General comments

• Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
  • No problems were found in the lede.
  • Early life and career: Readers might not know what YPFB is because it is an abbreviation. Change it to "YPFB, an oil and gas enterprise,".
    • Changed to "the state-owned petroleum enterprise". Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Rest of the article meets the 1a criteria.
• Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Add something notable that he did while serving in the Chamber of Deputies (e.g. working on the recognition of the Afro-Bolivian population).
    • I assume you meant in the lede. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
  • The infobox is properly formatted.
  • Add original Spanish text of the quotes in the article that have been translated into English immediately after the quotes in parenthesis, per MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE.
    • Check. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Commission assignments: Add alt text for the video.
    • Check! Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
  • The article complies with the MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:EMBED guidelines. There is no fiction here, so I am skipping MOS:WAF.
• Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
  • References section (including an explanatory note, footnotes, and bibliography) with {{notelist}} and {{reflist}} templates is present in the article.
  • There was one referencing issue which I fixed (extra spacing in the table).
  • Listed references are reliable, they are either books or news articles.
    • Is Ref 32 really locked behind a subscription, because I can access it? Ref 31 for example tells me that I have to be subscribed to read the rest of the article.
      • Seems not. I marked it preemptively because this newspaper usually limited access after a few days. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
    • I will let the Twitter source pass considering that it is the official account of the Chamber of Deputies.
  • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 16, 23, 28, 32, 34–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
  • Copyvio already checked.
• Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
  • The article addresses the main aspects and stays focused on the topic.
• Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
  • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• Checking whether the article is stable.
  • As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
• Checking images and videos.
  • The infobox image has been reviewed and is properly licensed.
  • The URL of the video redirects to a video of Medina from 15 August 2013. Please replace it with the URL of the video that is in this article. The Flickr link does however confirm that the license is CC BY 2.0. Or you can replace the video that is currently in the article with the one that is on Flickr and fix the information in the video summary.
    • The URL links to a compilation of multiple clips. The precise clip used starts at 1:41. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

      Ok I see that now. Vacant0 (talk) 12:27, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Final comments

@Krisgabwoosh: I will put this on hold for a week so that you can fix the issues that I've pointed out in the review. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 16:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

You've addressed the issues, so I am passing this one. Congratulations! Vacant0 (talk) 12:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.