Talk:José-Miguel Bernardo
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: 'Research Interests' section of http://www.uv.es/~bernardo/vitae.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Qwfp (talk) 18:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Reversion of material
editAn anonymous contributor has now twice attempted to delete the referenced material concerning Prof Bernardo's expulsion from the ISBA. The IP address of the contributor suggests a vested interest in doing so. Perhaps an admin could act to prevent this happening again ? Thanks ! Robma (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's only sourced to primary sources and so per WP:BLPPRIMARY doesn't belong in the article. Please don't add it back without a reliable secondary source. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- WP:BLPPRIMARY warns against misuses of primary sources. It is a simple fact that J. M. Bernardo was expelled; nothing to argue about here. (talk) 10:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Discussion can be found at WP:BLP/N#Jose Miguel Bernardo. Zaereth (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- From WP:BLPPRIMARY
Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies.
- And the BLP/N discussion now found at [1] confirms this. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Deletion of reference to ISBA ruling
editGiven that Prof Bernardo had a clear conflict of interest in deleting the reference to the ruling, I would suggest a disinterested party should reinstate it, and then either leave it or immediately delete it according to their view of the discussion referenced by Zaereth. Thank you ! Robma (talk) 11:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)