Talk:José Cruxent

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This is an excellent choice of topic, since Cruxent definitely merits an article. However, the style of this article is substantially different from other similar Wikipedia biographies. There should be a brief introductory paragraphy stating the basics of who he was and why he was notable followed by sections about his life, his career, his discoveries, etc. I would recommend looking at well-developed articles about other notable archaeologists in order to see models of how this one should be further developed. For example, the first paragraph contains details of his life that are not essential to a brief synopsis. You should also go farther towards inserting adequate hyperlinks to relevant articles, especially ones that would help the average reader to understand more about archaeology. Please see my revisions for some basic adjustments. I think you'll see that this article could be much improved with some basic modifications. Note that many of the hyperlinks that could be made were not done so correctly. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Saying "Not much is known about his early life" is peculiar. This information may be difficult to find, but it is surely known. When did he immigrate to Venezuela? Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The 'Contributions to Archaeology section is one where you should discuss his many interests, from Paleoindian to historic occupations. It would be good to describe the significance of his specific finds. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

At present, the sections on Contributions to Archaeology, Contributions to Higher Education, and Contributions to Art are empty. While these suggest content that would improve the article, it is generally not good Wikipedia practice to include blank subsections. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note how I've added additional headings that organize his life and contributions into a meaningful sequence. I've also added a number of hyperlinks that augment the connectedness of the content. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The term Literary Works is not appropriate for the kind of scientific literature for which he is best known ("literary" usually refers to fiction or essays). You should include complete bibliographic citations for all of these entries, using a standard (and complete) bibliographic citation form (one that includes not only title and date, but also publisher, place of publication, etc.) Book titles should be set in italics. For his articles, you should include the names of the journals in which they appeared, the volume and issue numbers, and the specific page numbers of each. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

You need to correct the references so that the footnotes make sense. Please see other Wikipedia articles for the correct style. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note that the current article on the Pre-Columbian period in Venezuela is not very good and makes no direct reference to Cruxent. You can improve this by adding appropriate hyperlinks back to this biographical article. Hoopes (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José Cruxent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply