Talk:José Iborra
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 12 May 2021
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 12 May 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 06:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
José Iborra Blanco → José Iborra – WP:COMMONNAME is just "José Iborra", doesn't use maternal surname professionally. Sources on page: 1, 2. Ortizesp (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 12:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 21:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose neither source confirms the COMMONNAME suggested? Second source also questionable. GiantSnowman 21:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)- The first source lists him as just "Iborra" on the header without maternal surname. The second source lists him as "José Iborra" in the second paragraph, in the "Datos de interes" section.@GiantSnowman:--Ortizesp (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying - still not convinced, but not enough to oppose a move. GiantSnowman 18:13, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- The first source lists him as just "Iborra" on the header without maternal surname. The second source lists him as "José Iborra" in the second paragraph, in the "Datos de interes" section.@GiantSnowman:--Ortizesp (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.