Talk:Jose Roberto Antonio

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Vanity Fair and Manila Times material

edit

Is there a valid concern with the Vanity Fair and Manila Times material [1] ? Various IPs and SPAs have removed it with no explanation, then for being sourced to a dead link, than for WP:NPA, and now as character assassination. Multiple editors have restored it. The Vanity Fair piece simply contrasts Antonio’s $15 million house and museum with the $5,000 average family income, as our article states. The Manila Times article link is off line and I was unable to locate a new link for it on the Manila Times site, but there is a letter to the editor referencing it (so it is not a hoax ref), and a short excerpt of the original piece is reproduced here https://www.yahoo.com/news/filipino-real-estate-developer-expects-35-portraits-of-himself-to-fill-his-personal-art-museum-113042509.html?ref=gs . Out coverage seems reasonable neutral to me. Meters (talk) 01:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Found the full text here http://www.pressreader.com/philippines/manila-times/20130624/281500748823471 Meters (talk) 01:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jose Roberto Antonio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply