Talk:Josh Bornstein

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Josh Bornstein is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

talmud article

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

it looks very clear to me that this article was not written by josh bornstein. not only does it use a lot of /pol/ memes, theres also this: http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/42271853/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skairim (talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is a promotional piece of marketing fluff

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This should be deleted. There is nothing noteworthy about the subject of the article: no landmark cases, no academic distinctions, no important legal publications. Nothing but involvement in some parochial Australian court cases that have no wider significance. This belongs in the 'About Us' section of the promotional website of a legal firm not in Wikipedia. AnotherPseudonym (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic