Talk:Josh Tetrick

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Neutrality issue

edit

Hi, I saw there was an issue with the section. I'm happy to help with the tone of this section if I get a chance this weekend. Any other editors want to weigh in? ReginaldTQ (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'd say this kind of language isn't encyclopedic: "Tetrick has driven Hampton Creek to achieve many business milestones in a remarkably short amount of time". It has more the flavor of editorializing. "Has driven" is a non-standard, marketing-style phrase, and "remarkably short" seems pretty POV. It should be fine after toning down the marketing language (which never convinces readers to take a company seriously anyway, when done overtly). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.139.122.155 (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Agreed and I hope I helped. Seemed salesy to me too. DLCasper (talk) 23:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Joshua Tetrick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply