Talk:Joshua Ledet
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joshua Ledet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 March 2012. The result of the discussion was Articles should be renominated individually. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Time to re-remove "order number" and "result" from American Idol performances table
editAn editor has continually re-added these superfluous columns which don't seem encyclopedic to me.
The order number is a matter of fact but has nothing to do with Ledet himself. Instead it's something the producers of the show control to make for a more compelling production. We seem to be implying that the order number has any meaning whatsoever. We might as well go into details about how many back-up singers he had, what he wore and the arrangement. And we would be using almost exclusively fan sites and original sources to document this. Even dedicated entertainment news columns only cover this information trivially if at all. We have no reliable sources to state why a performer went 1st, 5th or 10th. And even if we did, we need a pretty good reason to include it as anything useful to understanding Ledet.
The results column is equally unhelpful. Of course he ascends to the next level until eliminated, this is true for every contestant except the winner. So the only possible relevant information is that he landed in the bottom two or three. This should only be noted if reliable sources comment on it in depth. That is, it's a ploy of reality shows, to build tension, to woo the emotions of the audience. What's notable is if they are eliminated which is covered in the prose. If several reliable sources note "wow, he's been in the bottom two five times", that also could be added to the prose. The notability of the information is too low for this chart. Insomesia (talk) 11:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Joshua Ledet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140728000853/http://www.emusicality.com/2012/07/billboard-200-chart-american-idol.html to http://www.emusicality.com/2012/07/billboard-200-chart-american-idol.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306083119/http://www.americanidol.com/contestants/season_11/joshua_ledet/ to http://www.americanidol.com/contestants/season_11/joshua_ledet/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)