Talk:Joshua Toulmin
A fact from Joshua Toulmin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 October 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edits currently required
editNice start, but it needs more work. This is my review:
- "Dr. Toulmin's sympathy to both the American (1775-1783) and French (1787–1799) revolutions lead this Englishman to be education by the United States and caused others to see this prolific historian as a religious radical." Something is wrong with this sentence. Bad prose!
- Don't say all the time "Dr. Toulmin" or "R. Toulmin". "Toulmin" is Ok.
- Your three first sections in "biography" are stubby. Merge or expand. I'd suggest merge. They are all about his early life and family. After you merge make also the prose a bit more coherent so that the passing from one section to the other is not seamless.
- Try to have inline citations at the end of the sentence. Cite somewhere in the middle only if it is absolutely necessary.
- Prose in "From Presbyterian to Baptist minister" not good. Many stubby paragraphs. Merge them or expand them.
- I think the information about his main life (after early life and marriage) are inadequate. Can you get us a bit more about him.
- "Caused others to see this prolific historian as a religious radical". I'd like to elaborate a bit on that in a seperate section. Some criticisms and assessments about his life, role and influence in both the American and the French Revolution would be nice.
- In "Works" why do you citate 3 external lnks in the wazy you do? You already have a notes section. Don't you? Transfer this citations there and citate properly.
- A very long list with his works. I'd suggest to create a seperate article and make a short selection with his most important works for this article.
- All the printed sources you used in "Notes" should also be mentioned in "References". Are they? If you don't like this system, then delete the "References" section and have just the "Notes" one.
- All the links in "See also" section are redundant. Get rid of it!
- The "The Serial Dissenting Minister" section has no inline citation.--Yannismarou 08:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joshua Toulmin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/19990822060100/http://freespace.virgin.net/paul.mansfield1/taunname.txt to http://freespace.virgin.net/paul.mansfield1/taunname.txt
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.polybiblio.com/tabooks/RLRB056467.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)