Talk:Jsu Garcia
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COI?
editI see a COI tag, but no rationale here. What's up?
The article seems to be a mess that a few minor edits could fix. I'll try some. --Aladdin Sane (talk) 03:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Found it. The diff is here. I can see now that there is a potential COI, and the editor accused, User:Zoegolightly, seems to have contributed references that really look more like a sales attempt than real references, and seems to be the same person as the author of the so-called references, Zoe Golightly. —Aladdin Sane (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- Zoegolightly would seem to the Zoe Golightly who lists her current occupation as "PR Specialist at MSIA". This is the religious group founded by Garcia's spiritual guru and business partner, John-Roger -- wormcast 23:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- almost all the material in this article related to "spiritual warriors" does nothing to establish notability for the film or the production company. i removed it. a review in an outlet not directly connected to the religious organization would help. IMDB just shows existence, and doesnt establish notability. I would request anyone thinking of reverting my edits provide a rationale for doing so.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- I know that the news reports provided show screenings, but the problem is the source is from a branch paper of MSIA. we cant have dozens of press releases from their paper to establish multiple screenings. Unless we have a source from a news agency outside MSIA noting their screenings, or from a festival schedule (one of which i left in the article), we cannot include them as notable screenings. what we dont know is whether these presumably free screenings are attended mostly by MSIA members, in which case this is simply a nonnotable internal matter for the organization. I hope the subject of the article doesnt think im being unfair, but this material simply cannot stay here. again, third party agencies of any sort can be quoted or given as references. Note that i have also added material to the article, including appropriate links. This should show i am not biased AGAINST the subject, but simply want to build the article correctly. I apologize for not giving edit summaries consistently, that is a clear area of weakness in my edits.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- almost all the material in this article related to "spiritual warriors" does nothing to establish notability for the film or the production company. i removed it. a review in an outlet not directly connected to the religious organization would help. IMDB just shows existence, and doesnt establish notability. I would request anyone thinking of reverting my edits provide a rationale for doing so.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Jsu Garcia, Barnes & Nobel, Los Angeles.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Jsu Garcia, Barnes & Nobel, Los Angeles.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jsu Garcia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/65C4Jghvj?url=http://www.jsugarcia.com/Personal-Info/Biography.html to http://www.jsugarcia.com/Personal-Info/Biography.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.smmirror.com/MainPages/DisplayArchiveArticle.asp?eid=4807%2C - Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jsugarcia.com/Personal-Info/Biography.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)