This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Most probably he (Vizcarra) deleted such statements because there were no sources. Feel free to put back that info but cite your sources because if you dont then someone else, or even Vizcarra, will be deleting your edits or putting a tag on them. --Abögarp16:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. I still rephrased it. If you don't add that the strikers were indeed violent... against university authorities... against the police ... against students who didn't agree with the strike, against the installations... adding the simplistic statement that his solution was "violent" violates neutral point of view. His solution to the problem is highly regarded as effective. There is mention of violent confrontations of strikers with the police even in the BBC source you have added "university authorities had requested help from the federal police after striking students attacked university staff and non-striking students." --Vizcarra23:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
This may end as an endeless argument that, indeed, has taken place in the past. I suggest not to longer it here, even that I do not share your point of view that students were violent. There were violence but it was seldom started by provocators and radicals that were never the majority. The term "violent" may be left out from this page in spite of agreement. Boninho01:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Personally, I'd say the students holding Ciudad Universitaria were among the most violent ones. I was a student at Prepa 6 at the time and the strikers there were reasonably open to dialogue. Then again, there was at least one big fight between them and students that opposed the strike that even made it into national TV. -- RuneWelsh | ταλκ20:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)Reply