Talk:Judicial review in Canada
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Paigemo.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Page moved
editPaigemo, I've moved this page per your professor's request, however I do note that the page still needs work. There are some sections that appear to be blank and the page does sometimes read like a student WP:ESSAY in places. You also need to be careful that you aren't redundant to the main page on judicial review - in other words, you need to specify how Canada's version of judicial review is different from other places. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Paigemo, as well as this, the two cases discussed so far have their own Wikipedia pages, so they should be bluelinked to those pages and checked against them. LexLife (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)