Talk:Judicial system of Singapore/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Comments
Should we talk about the salaries of the chief justice and judges of the supreme court? How about accusations of creating a 'legal bribe' in the form of high salaries from the government so as to create a compliant judiciary? Also how about the government's amazing success rate in its defamation suits against political opponents?
Please discuss. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.5 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
re
you can right about put in anything (which is relevant) you want provided it can be attributed to verifiable and reliable sources. otherwise it would be either original research, speculation, or plain libelous. this is an encyclopedia, first and foremost. but i can give some preliminary answers to your points. regarding salaries, you pay top dollar for competence, simple as that. it's economics. regarding the defamation suits, explain which decision you think is wrong and why it is wrong. Chensiyuan 18:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
re
Ok I'll write a paragraph on that. I'll get my sources and post the draft on the discussion page first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.42.146.50 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)