Talk:Judiciary of England and Wales
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
History
editIt seems that this article, and many of the ancient terms it references, have an ancient history that is entirely missing. Either the name should indicate that it refers to the present, or it should include or clearly link with coverage of the history. Ranmore (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Justices of the Supreme Court
editThe article as currently written appears to suggest that Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom are subordinate to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. The England and Wales Judiciary website states that the Supreme Court is a UK body and is not under the remit of the Lord Chief Justice.
Therefore, should this section be remove from the article?
Qualification period
editThe article uses the phrase "must satisfy the judicial-appointment eligibility condition on a (7/5)-year basis." 6 times. How is "on a 7 year basis" different to "of 7 years standing"? The difference in phrasing implies a difference in the qualification period. If there is no difference then the simpler phrase should be used, if there is a difference it should be explained. treesmill (talk) 13:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
High Court article question
editCan anyone answer the High Court article question posted at this link? Thank you in advance. Bo99 (talk) 14:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Judiciary of England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221000105/http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/en/07en15-d.htm to http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/en/07en15-d.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://jac.judiciary.gov.uk/1386.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Stupid question, but
editthe salaries are per year, not per month? (German here)--2001:A61:260D:6E01:8DB9:9043:E5B4:4FA4 (talk) 18:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- They are annual salaries. I've updated them for the year beginning 1 April 2018. -- Picapica (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)