Talk:Julian Beever
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Julian Beever article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Angle on picture
editThe picture of the mountain dew ad is obviously seen from the correct angle, as the picture is right-side up. If it was, as marked, from the "wrong" viewpoint, it would be very stretched. I'm changing the caption. --Ironchef8000 (talk) 01:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think you're right, but there's no point in pointing out it's the right angle. So I removed the sentence altogether. Key to the city (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- The Mountain Dew ad is slightly stretched to one side. These things don't work on a "right-side up or wrong-side up" basis - you have to be standing in exactly the right spot for the illusion to work. (A view from the correct angle is here.)
- It's worth pointing out that it's viewed from the wrong angle, because the given example doesn't look very good and does a poor job of illustrating Beever's work. --McGeddon (talk) 16:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- I've now replaced this with a better-quality photo of a later work, found on Flickr (although I'm not convinced that this one is from quite the right angle either). --McGeddon (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Clean Up
editThe article was full of fan guff, so I've removed it all and just left the factual elements (most of which need sources, but I don't have time tonight). I'll try to clean it up a bit more when I have time, he sounds an interesting person, but the article needed to be far more encylopedic! BulbaThor (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Major expansion and rewrite
editI've completely overhauled the article, adding much biographical background and artistic development info, with references. Some more pictures might better convey what his artwork is about, and his masterful skill in drawing. Reify-tech (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)