Talk:Julian Wachner

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Maurice Magnus in topic Hiding URLs

Hello fellow Wikipedians.

Subsequent to the NYT's reporting of the sexual assault allegations against Julian Wachner, updates to Mr. Wachner's Wikipedia page were added. The third paragraph states "On March 13, 2022, The New York Times reported sexual assult allegations against Wachner...Wachner was put on leave on March 1, 2022, by Trinity Wall Street after former colleagues and coworkers of Wachner across multiple institutions had come forward with stories of abuse by Wachner, whether as victims or witnesses, which prompted The New York Times reporting as well as an internal investigation at Trinity." I can find no stories from victims or witnesses of abuse by Wachner reported in the Times or elsewhere, other than the one incident reported by the Times. Language on Trinity's web page stated that the veracity of the claims of the alleged victim had not been determined. I cannot find any public information to support the claims of the second sentence in the third paragraph. If the sentence can be supported by reported public information, that should be cited in order to give credibility to the claim. Otherwise, the sentence seems to be inaccurate and potentially libelous.

I look forward to seeing the conclusion by editors of this talk. --Deepreader1 (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

It has been seven weeks and no other editor has replied to your comment or to mine below headed "Source?" I have therefore deleted the sentence you and I noted to be unsupported, and I made "allegations" singular, because I've read only of one. (I also caught a typo in a footnote.) Maurice Magnus (talk) 01:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Wachner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Source?

edit

The third paragraph states but provides no source for, "former colleagues and coworkers of Wachner across multiple institutions had come forward with stories of abuse by Wachner, whether as victims or witnesses." I just added [citation needed]. The New York Times article cited in the section does not contain the information in the quotation.Maurice Magnus (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hiding URLs

edit

The footnotes had numerous URLs spelled out. I have put brackets around them to hide them. But I don't know how to hide the two that remain near the end (currently notes 41 and 42). Can someone else do it?Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I did it for notes 41 and 42. The only remaining unhidden URL is in note 19. Maurice Magnus (talk) 20:20, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply