Talk:Julie Croteau

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Maile66 in topic Did you know nomination

Photos of Julie Croteau are needed

edit

Due to Wikipedia policy changes, photos of are needed of her that have no copyright (or re-use) restrictions whatsoever.

When uploading her photos. please include a description with her name, or no one will be able to do a search for it.

Upload here-- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard

Many thanks! :-)

Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 02:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Julie Croteau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 17:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede

edit

Playing and coaching career

edit

Professional baseball

edit

USA Baseball

edit

Personal life

edit

References

edit

General comments

edit
  • No photos to address
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 22:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@GhostRiver: comments responded to. Therapyisgood (talk) 23:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for making those changes! Everything looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 16:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Maile66 (talk01:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Therapyisgood (talk). Self-nominated at 22:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Interesting article and interesting hook. Article meets all the criteria, as does the hook, and I see no reason not to approve. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@JJonahJackalope: I've reworded the hook a bit and added an explanatory note to the article. The hook needs a re-review. Therapyisgood (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looks good, explanatory note works and I see no reason not to approve this new hook. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Therapyisgood and JJonahJackalope: mind if I yoink this for March 8 (International Women's Day)? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 11:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have no issue with that if the dyk nominator doesn't. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
No issue. Therapyisgood (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Note:Actually promoted to Prep by SL93

"becoming the first women to play in a Major League Baseball-sanctioned league."

edit

Wouldn't this be someone like Toni Stone with the recognition of the Negro Leagues as a major league? Therapyisgood (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply