Talk:Julie Roy (activist)
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that Julie Roy was the first woman to successfully sue her therapist for sexual coercion?
- Source: Dictionary of Women Worldwide (https://www.encyclopedia.com/women/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/roy-julie-c-1938): "Became 1st woman to successfully sue psychiatrist for inveigling her into sexual relationship under guise of therapy"
- ALT1: ... that a future high-profile divorce lawyer represented Julie Roy in the first successful lawsuit against a therapist for sexual coercion? Source: Betrayal - https://archive.org/details/betrayaltruestor00free/mode/2up - referred to as "Bob Cohen" through the book, the foreword gives thanks to "Robert Stephan Cohen and Loren H. Plotkin for their support and assistance"
- Reviewed:
- Comment: this is my second DYK nomination. i learned from the mistakes I made the first time, made sure to cite all important claims in the article, waited until the article was properly evaluated to submit the DYK, and will be active in fixing any issues that may arise.
Moved to mainspace by Jeschaton (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
jeschaton (immanentize) 21:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC).
- As this is a "first" hook, per WP:DYKHOOK, sourcing has to be exceptionally strong to make sure that the fact about it being the first of its kind is accurate. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Neither hook is fine. The first, as said, needs an exceptionally strong source, and it cites a dictionary. The second has a WP:EASTEREGG link. And overall, people notable for only one event should not have an article about the person, but about the event. Please rearrange the info accordingly, and we may make a full review. Cambalachero (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeschaton: Please address the above.--Launchballer 20:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
