This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
|
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box. |
|
Israel
editFrom main page, under holidays:
- Israel - Tisha B'Av, this is not a holiday, but many stores and most restaurants close
Tisha b'Av is the ninth day of the month of Av in the Hebrew Calendar--it doesn't fall on the same Gregorian day every year. (I assume someone meant "not a legal holiday", but that's an easy fix if the entry belongs at all.) Vicki Rosenzweig
Protection?
editWould anyone object to a temporary protection? Looking through the recent history this past month, I see a lot of good reverts. Maybe semi-protecting for a while would keep the history clean. Justin(c)(u) 03:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I love semi-protection, but I don't think the level of activity on this article is any different from many others. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 03:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, comparative activity isn't really important, but overall activity shows a lot of... activity (I don't want to call each one vandalism, just misguided efforts). Justin(c)(u) 04:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- This article has had less than 50 edits in the last month. If you look at an article like January 23 there were 50 edits in the last week. (I'm not arguing, by the way - just trying to understand why you would think to protect this one and not others) -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 04:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I'm watching this one :) I guess the article wouldn't fall apart if we had to keep reverting. Justin(c)(u) 04:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- This article has had less than 50 edits in the last month. If you look at an article like January 23 there were 50 edits in the last week. (I'm not arguing, by the way - just trying to understand why you would think to protect this one and not others) -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 04:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, comparative activity isn't really important, but overall activity shows a lot of... activity (I don't want to call each one vandalism, just misguided efforts). Justin(c)(u) 04:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
== Add a birthday ==]
Edward Drinker Cope [[1]] is not listed in the July 28 birthdays section. meee!!!!
Births and deaths
editIn accordance with the guidelines, I've started weeding the Births and Deaths sections by removing entries for celebrities with 0-4 articles in other languages. Where possible, these have been transferred to the relevant Year in Topic articles. As well as making the lists more manageable, this will help with the globalization effort. Deb (talk) 21:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the "Births" entry for Robert Hooke as he was not born on the 28th of July, but rather the 18th. Snooze Dogg (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Are future events allowed?
editOn 2061, Halley's comet will pass by. Until someone clarifies this, I am accepting the edit. L3X1 Complaints Desk 17:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on July 28. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121210034555/http://www1.sympatico.ca/cgi-bin/on_this_day?mth=Jul&day=28 to http://www1.sympatico.ca/cgi-bin/on_this_day?mth=Jul&day=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)