Talk:Junior Johnson

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2600:1700:DF50:7A10:C58E:759D:5823:9161 in topic Confederate General lineage


Inaccurate Family History?

edit

I noticed in the "Driving Days" section it states that Johnson's Scottish ancestors moved to Wilkes County, in North Carolina's western section, in the "early 1600s." As I recall, North Carolina didn't experience large-scale European colonization until much later, and North Carolina's foothills weren't colonized until the late 1600s and early 1700s - or almost a century later than the article claims. The first permanent English colony, Jamestown, Virginia, wasn't founded until around 1607, so I'm skeptical regarding this claim about Johnson's ancestry. 70.145.229.162 (talk) 01:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

Credited with discovering drafting and inventing the "bootleg turn" even though he was two at the end of prohibition. OK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.69.40.197 (talk) 11:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brewing and selling liquor remained illegal in many states even after Prohibition was lifted at the national level. In North Carolina many counties remained "dry" long after Prohibition officially ended in 1933 (four counties are still "dry" as of 2008). Thus, Johnson is given credit for inventing the bootleg turn even though Prohibition had ended much earlier. Someone may have used such a turn during Prohibition, but if so they never received the publicity for it that Johnson did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.229.162 (talk) 04:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Presidential pardon

edit

I reverted the edit by Cresix concerning the pardon. Cresix re-reverted it saying that subscription-based cites don't belong. I understand that there is general sentiment against those types of cites. I'm not here to debate that. I didn't put in the link originally and grant you that the little abstract shown on the link doesn't show the info cited. That said, having read the full text of the article, I can state that it actually does say what is cited. Now, if you want to have the New York Times newspaper citation without the web link, that is fine, but even without the link, that was a perfectly valid citation. That section with the citation needs to be restored. Just wanted to discuss here instead of re-reverting again, per WP:BRD. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please quote the relevant sections of the NYT article here that support the statement. Thanks. Cresix (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Never mind. I found another source. Cresix (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Junior Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Confederate General lineage

edit

Researching the entry that his “maternal great-grandfather was the second-highest-ranking officer in North Carolina’s Confederate Army”. Within my research I found a General Johnston, but not a General Johnson, having no distinction of being classified 2nd in Command. 2600:1700:DF50:7A10:C58E:759D:5823:9161 (talk) 18:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply