Talk:Junk fax

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request photograph

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

{{reqphoto}} Edward 11:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

A photo's been added Alex Muller 20:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

situation in UK

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I often get junk faxes from UK. Are junk faxes allowed in UK or is there a chance to stop this garbage? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.128.127.139 (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

Lack of NPOV

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This entire article lacks NPOV. It has too much conversation and not enough facts. I'll rewrite the worst parts today, and come back later to do more. NoBiggie 15:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junk fax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040607062059/http://www.spamlaws.com/cases/blastfax.html to http://www.spamlaws.com/cases/blastfax.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic