Talk:Junk (film)
(Redirected from Talk:Junk the Movie)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Junk (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Japanese script
editDone. I confirmed it by this page.[1] In Japanese edition, "Junk" is capitalized. --Nightshadow28 14:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Stub
editThis article lacks (in the main text) all the basic information which should be contained in an introduction. Even though it is present in the infobox, the article still needs to begin with "Junk is a Japanese film directed by X and released in 2000." or the like. LordAmeth 13:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the cast and crew of the Japanese zombie film Junk, which made use of real meat for its gore effects, were sometimes unable to stomach meat for dinner after spending hours filming? Source: England, Norman (May 2003). "Who Made This Junk?". Fangoria. No. 222. Starlog Group, Inc. pp. 43–44. ISSN 0164-2111.
- ALT1:... that the cast and crew of the Japanese zombie film Junk, which made use of real meat for its gore effects, were sometimes unable to stomach meat for dinner after hours spent filming? Source: England, Norman (May 2003). "Who Made This Junk?". Fangoria. No. 222. Starlog Group, Inc. pp. 43–44. ISSN 0164-2111.
5x expanded by MatthewHoobin (talk). Self-nominated at 21:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC).
- This article has been expanded by a factor of five (97 words to 1,647) between August 26 and September 2. It's definitely long enough to qualify. Copyvio scanner returns nothing. Information is cited and neutrally written. Hook is cited and interesting. No real issues with grammar or spelling. The only image (the infobox image) has a legitimate fair-use rationale. Nominator doesn't have enough DYK credits for QPQ to be required -- this looks good to me. jp×g 19:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)