Talk:Junkers Ju 160
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Junkers Ju 160 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Queries
edit- Turner and Nowarra give the first flight as June 1934, the Junkers site as 30 Jan 34, which is what we say. I'd guess the former source was more reliable on the whole (junkers disagrees with itself sometimes); but do we have a better source? What does Kay's book (Putnam) have to say?
- Most sources seem to think production was 47, but GoldenYears rebuilt register shows a continuous block of c/ns from 4202 (V1) to 4248, all in the D-reg apart from 4205 in Manchuria. So was there a 4249 that went somewhere else, or did not go onto the civil reg anywhere?
- Turner & Nowarra talk about models A and D implying C and B; GoldenYears lists 1xC and 6xB, but data on them seems very hard to find. Kay again?TSRL (talk) 22:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Junkers Ju 160. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219070818/http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/ to http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)