Talk:Junkers Ju 252

Latest comment: 4 years ago by NiD.29 in topic Variants section

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

edit

Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junkers Ju 252. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junkers Ju 252. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Variants section

edit

Denniss I recently added a variants section to this article, in which I put the Ju 352 and Ju 452 as developments, which is in line with the manual of style for aircraft articles. Two hours later, Denniss reverted my edit without an explanation. Perhaps we should discuss this here to avoid any misunderstandings. - ZLEA T\C 02:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

352 not a variant + also listed in infobox/See also section. Ju 452 was a paper project at best. --Denniss (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Denniss Many articles on WWII German aircraft, including Dornier Do 335, Messerschmitt Me 262, Messerschmitt Bf 109 variants, and Heinkel He 219, list developments, some of them paper projects, with the main variants. If not the 352, would you be opposed to listing the 452 in the variants section like so many other articles? - ZLEA T\C 13:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Paper projects, regardless of how far they got are deemed sufficiently notable for inclusion, and if there was more than one variant, there should be a variants section. As for the 352, developments are often included in variants, and that was what the 352 was. It would be remiss for either of these to not be included. - NiD.29 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply