This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The latitude and longitude in the article, 34.033°N, 117.391°W, which match the source, identify a flat field with no tree. Here is a topo map and aerial view. I understand the value of hiding the location to deter vandals, but if this is known to be erroneous, better wording would be "located within a few miles of..." rather than "located at..." Numbersinstitute (talk) 18:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, it looks like it's perhaps southwest of there by that water tower, judging from the photo in the other version of that article (External Links). Changing wording in article. Thanks! — Henry chianski (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
_Gold_color.svg)