Talk:Justice First

Untitled

The name of this party, should be Primero Justicia not "Justice First"... it sounds, wtf... xD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.204.47.73 (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Untitled

Primero Justicia defined itself as centre-left in one of its latest congresses (if I remember correctly); however, I believe the term the party is primarily embracing is 'centre-humanist'.

190.77.117.1 (talk) 05:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Because being right-anything is generally considered negative, you won't find ANY modern political party which name themselves as Right or even Center-Right, those who are Center-Right are indeed very well Right sided. Thing is that, not because a political party says in a speech they are this or so, it will become automatically true.

Primero Justicia is well known to be a Center-Right party in Venezuela, as it is stated by the Venezuelan public opinion, other political parties (allies and officials) and even by their own militants. It is a party generally ahead to Elite and conservative wealthy families (aside from political personal opinon)but with generally young and well educated new faces, it can be seen as a reborn COPEI, but unlike them, Primero Justicia tend to support more agressive actions instead of defensive positions. Because their imitation of "populism" methodology used by leftist parties, and its lack of military structure and links, it cannot be totally cataloged as Right side as it is the Popular Party in Spain. Indeed this article has a confusion in the information, stating both informations, center-right, and center-left. IMO center right is the correct data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.166.237.124 (talk) 05:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I disagree with yout assertion that "center-right" is considered negative. Moreover, the way a party defines itself is ultimately how it should be viewed~ at least "officially". At the very least, the controversy should be noted ("Primero Justicia views itself as a center humanistbparty, but some observers believe etc etc). There is no such thing as a homogenuous Venezuelan public opinion and such opinion is not, in any case, sufficiently clear or "supported" assertions for Wikipedia.200.93.122.205 (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Justice First. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050826085255/http://www.primerojusticia.org.ve/ to http://www.primerojusticia.org.ve/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050826085255/http://www.primerojusticia.org.ve/ to http://www.primerojusticia.org.ve/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)