Talk:K-104 (Kansas highway)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-104 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 00:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • It may help to mention the National Highway System fact as the last sentence of the route description to provide for better flow.

   •  Done Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

   • The National Highway System fact seems misplaced in the lead, can it be moved to before the description of the history in the lead?

   •  Done Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   • The sentence "The route travels 2.3 miles (3.7 km) from a junction with K-4 highway to a junction with Interstate 135/U.S. Route 81 (I-135/US-81) at I-135 exit 86, has an annual average daily traffic of between 1000 and 1300, and is paved with composite pavement." is long and needs to be split.

   •  Done Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   • What kind of "rural land" does K-104 pass? farms? woods?

   •  Done I think...all I did was change it from "rural land" to "rural farmland"...if that's not enough I can be more specific. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

   • Is there any more history that can be added?

   • There was none that I could find when I was looking for sources...historical information about this highway is actually pretty much nonexistent. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • As a note, the map should be included in the infobox; I have fixed that for you.

   • I had the image in the route description section because I was planning on getting a different map the same style as File:I-235 (KS) map.svg made for the infobox after this passed GA with the present one being in the route description section to show the route in greater detail, but I'm fine with it being in the infobox for now. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

   • An image of the road would be nice, but not required.

   • I can get one when I go home this next weekend, I think. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 01:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few minor fixes. Dough4872 00:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The article looks good now so I will pass it. Dough4872 02:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)