Talk:K-108 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 22:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm back for another one! Comments can be seen below, and the nomination is on hold. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@PCN02WPS: Everything should be fixed now. I just removed the against state law part because I can't locate the source. The map is loading slow for me, I think they have been having that problem. Thanks, -420Traveler (talk) 14:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Looks good, happy to pass. Congrats. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Lead/infobox

• Since the northern and southern terminus were both at US-59 in Erie, could that sentence be shortened to say something similar to that?
• Link auto trail in lead
• "...as well as K-108 which would connect Erie to the new alignment." → comma after "K-108"
• The map in the infobox is not loading for me but if it's displaying for you I'll AGF, probably an issue on my end

Route description

• "they determined that on average the traffic varied" → commas before and after "on average"
• "The National Highway System is a system of highways important to the nation's defense, economy, and mobility." → This sentence seems very out of place; I'd recommend either incorporating it as a part of the previous sentence, moving it to a footnote (a la K-87), or removing it entirely.

History

• "A portion of K-108 followed the former King of Trails." → is "King of Trails" the actual name of the trail or a nickname? This is unclear and should probably be noted either way.
• "It was not until early December 1957, that the Kansas State Highway Commission..." → remove comma, add bolded word
• In the third paragraph, you can use the abbreviation "KDOT" instead of the full-form "Kansas Department of Transportation" since the abbreviation and full name (with link) is given two paragraphs earlier

References

• Ref No. 15 gives me a 404 error (if you find an archive, then remove "KDOT" from the article name since it's given as the publisher already).
• In Refs No. 1 and 2, the "author" field can be removed since the given authors are the same gov't organizations given in the "publisher" field.
• Other spot checks look good.