Talk:K-148 (Kansas highway)/GA1
Latest comment: 4 years ago by ArnabSaha in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 15:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- Remove some duplinks, like Barnes.
- I think MOS:DUPLINK says that it can be repeated the first occurrence after the lead? This is usually done in road articles. 420Traveler (talk) 02:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yes Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 11:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think MOS:DUPLINK says that it can be repeated the first occurrence after the lead? This is usually done in road articles. 420Traveler (talk) 02:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- K-148 is a 86.665 --> An (as the number starts with vowel).
- "... length despite the fact that the last..." --> I would suggest changing it to "... length although the last" to make it simple and easy.
- If possible, add an image.
- Fixed Was able to find one. 420Traveler (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- "Before state highways were numbered..." the same is present twice. Edit and change anyone of them.
- Fixed I think? 420Traveler (talk) 02:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- 'Auto trails' capital letter not required, and link the first one in lead.
- Citation [16] isn't properly formatted.
- Fixed I just removed it as it was not needed and a dead link. 420Traveler (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 18:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
ArnabSaha asked if I could look at this. I only had a few minor comments:
Before state highways were numbered in Kansas there were auto trails, the former Meridian Highway crosses K-148 slightly west of Talmo, the former Kansas White Way crosses between K-15 and Barnes, and the former Pikes Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway crosses by Hanover.
- this is a run-on sentence. I suggest splitting into two after "auto trails".- Because each subsection is only one paragraph long, I would suggest removing the subheaders in the "History" section, which appear unnecessary. However, the subheaders in the "Route description" section seem to serve the purpose of separating the general route description from the specific route description. So I would instead suggest splitting these subsections into 2 paragraphs each, if possible.
K-148 is not included in the National Highway System.[6] The National Highway System is a system of highways important to the nation's defense, economy, and mobility.
- On the other hand, I would combine these two sentences.The highway continues east for 3.2 miles (5.1 km) then crosses Republican River, then passes the unincorporated community of Norway and has an at-grade crossing with a KYLE Railway track.
- this seems like a run-on, probably because of the use of "then" twice in the same sentence.KYLE Railway
- any link?- Fixed Found one. 420Traveler (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Here K-148 begins to overlap K-9 as the two highways continue east.
- here, you may want to link to concurrency (road).
These are the comments I had. epicgenius (talk) 18:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- pinging @420Traveler: Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 10:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha: Everything should be fixed now. 420Traveler (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Congrats Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 15:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha: Everything should be fixed now. 420Traveler (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)