Talk:K-153 (Kansas highway)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ArnabSaha in topic GA Review
 | K-153 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 27, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:K-153 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 06:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- If possible, add an image. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 06:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- The ksdot.org links aren't opening. Are they dead? or maybe these aren't visible in India. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 16:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- pinging @420Traveler: Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 16:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ill put new citations for this. Its something wrong with the Kansas Department of Transportations website. It been a problem for months. -420Traveler (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Passing the article as per Wikipedia talk:Good articles/Archive 15#Exceeding the criteria for ref formatting Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 20:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ill put new citations for this. Its something wrong with the Kansas Department of Transportations website. It been a problem for months. -420Traveler (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)