Talk:K-204 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Hello 420Traveler, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 01:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Just a suggestion but, I don't think its necessary to specify the Kansas State Highway Commission in the lead and just present its current name. The nuance can go into the body. The Kansas Department of Transportation should be wiki-linked.

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is clear and concise.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is compliant with the manual of style.	Pass

2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The article has a list of references and in line citations for all material in the body.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used are reliable	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright violation or plagiarism found.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article covers all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	No unnecessary deviations are present.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing edit warring or content disputes.	Pass

6. Illustration: The illustration is sufficient.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	N/A	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Caption is suitable.	Pass