Talk:K-22 (Kansas highway)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review
K-22 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:K-22 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rschen7754 07:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Image nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Lead
- K-22 is a 3.087 miles (4.968 km) long highway in the U.S. State of Kansas. - should be singular. Also, I believe you need a dash between 3.087 and mile (though I could be wrong?)
- It should still use the convert templates - I'm pretty sure there's a way to get the right format, look at the documentation. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed.— PCB 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- It should still use the convert templates - I'm pretty sure there's a way to get the right format, look at the documentation. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Route description
- The National Bridge Inventory doesn't indicate the position of the bridge (except for the mileage)... and I'm not sure that that's sufficient for what it's being used to support.
- It supports the name of the creek which wasn't on Google Maps. — PCB 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but it doesn't support where the road crosses it. I'll get back to you on this one. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- The mileage should be enough, so I'll let this go. --Rschen7754 20:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but it doesn't support where the road crosses it. I'll get back to you on this one. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- It supports the name of the creek which wasn't on Google Maps. — PCB 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- History
- A designation for K-22 began in 1932 - not very good phrasing. Also, you need to cite a 1931 map and a 1932 map for this to work.
- Better... the problem is now you have to say in between 1927 and 1932. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the 1927 map, I noticed that there's another K-22 marked on that map, in northwest Kansas near the Nebraska border. You should provide some information about that designation. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:20, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, I didn't notice. I'll have to add that in sometime later. — PCB 01:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Added. — PCB 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, I didn't notice. I'll have to add that in sometime later. — PCB 01:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the 1927 map, I noticed that there's another K-22 marked on that map, in northwest Kansas near the Nebraska border. You should provide some information about that designation. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:20, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Better... the problem is now you have to say in between 1927 and 1932. --Rschen7754 19:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
This designation was decommissioned between January and July of 1938. - where do you get January from?- There was a January map which I suppose I will have to cite. — PCB 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
with today's routing from US 36 to Haddam - redundancy with the first half of the sentence.
Placing this article on hold - shouldn't be too difficult to fix. --Rschen7754 08:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I think I have fixed everything. — PCB 15:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Passing GA. --Rschen7754 20:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)