Talk:K-32 (Kansas highway)

K-32 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 13, 2022. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-32 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 22:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I am also handling the copyediting on this article to account for the nominator's busy schedule (they have noted they are busy with work in a prior review of one of their articles, already have one GA nomination pending at review, are also pending on a languishing review of someone else's GAN, and have not edited in more than a week). Given the circumstances and GA's mammoth backlog, articles with changes this minor (and similar to those I've suggested on other Kansas highway pages) should not need to languish longer than necessary, and I suspect it'd be longer than needed at GAN otherwise. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyedit notes

View the diff

"Every time" is always two words...every time.
MOS:HOWEVER: this was not the correct use of a comma before "however".
I removed some of the excessive mentions of project costs in line with my comments at K-61.
I tweaked the truck route section to mention the accompanying city ordinance. I also made it a dual clipping of the whole article, not just the second page.
Combined and reflowed some sentences.

Source spot checks

3: Checks out. This is the Douglas County, not Sumner, map; I presume this was a copy error.
10: Checks out (but a terrible and hard to parse map with duplicated colors. That's on KDOT, not you.)
12: Resolution on city maintenance of state highways in Bonner Springs.
29: Offering of 4-lane upgrade contract.
34: with 33, comparison of state highway maps to show route extension.
44: Checks out in re: establishment of truck route.

Other items

Earwig turns up no similarities to other texts.
Images are appropriately licensed. Alt text was added.
References were archived.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic