Talk:K-87 (Kansas highway)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by PCN02WPS in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 22:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hi there, I'll review this article. My comments are below.

  • "On July 9, 1947, the highway was extended north to US-36" → was the extension done all in one day, or is this the day that the extension was started/finished?
That was when it was Approved to be added to the State Highway System. -420Traveler (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
It may not have to be but this was requested to be done in other GA reviews on Kansas roads. -420Traveler (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • "Kansas state highway system" → does this need to be capitalized, like "National Highway System" above?
      Not done: From what I can tell, "Kansas state highway system" works since it isn't being used as a proper noun. ― Tuna NoSurprisesPlease 23:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am out of time for now but I will aim to complete the rest of the review tonight; it shouldn't take too long. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

References look good, as far as I can tell. I haven't seen redlinks in the "website" parameter like that before but I can't find anything that advises for/against that and presence of redlinks are certainly not a barrier to GA, so I don't have any issues with it. Placing on hold so you can address these comments. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll ping both users that are attending to this one @Tunakanski and 420Traveler: the only outstanding issue is the one in the very first bullet point (just needs to be clarified in the lead). Other than that it's all good. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Should be   Fixed now. -420Traveler (talk) 03:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is indeed, happy to pass! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply