Talk:K2-24
Latest comment: 4 years ago by SevenSpheresCelestia in topic Merger proposal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the EPIC 203771098 page were merged into K2-24 on 6 October 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merger proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was Merge. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
K2-24 is the same object as EPIC 203771098 ([1] [2]), so these articles should be merged. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support: just do it. Same thing. This article shouldn't have been created but there is almost nothing in the other one that isn't here in updated form. Just have to pick a name now. The K2 name is used almost exclusively in the context of the planetary system and since almost nothing else worthwhile has been published on this object, I'd plump for K2-24. Double-check to see if there is anything needs copying from the other article and redirect it here. Lithopsian (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support: I'm surprised that this page was not renamed when EPIC 203771098 was given a K2 designation. There's no reason to have two different pages, and I believe this is akin to having a KOI and Kepler designations of the same object as two separate pages. EPIC 203771098 should be merged and redirected into K2-24 with any missing content on the latter page merged in. Davidbuddy9💬 15:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.